1.1. FAO (OS) No. 349/2012 was filed by the petitioner-State of Rajasthan impugning the judgment to the extent that the trustees of the Khetri Trust, who were the appellants in FAO (OS) No. 347/2012, ...
The Will, is a registered document and thus there is a presumption regarding genuineness thereof. The trial Court accepted the execution of the Will based on the evidence led before it. As the Will is ...
19. While deciding the aforesaid case, this Court referred to the 41st Report of the Indian Law Commission dated 24th September, 1969 recommending the introduction of a provision for grant of ...
The Delhi High Court has held that once final arguments in a criminal trial are concluded and the matter is reserved for judgment, the judge who heard the case is duty-bound to pronounce the verdict ...
Causing Death by Knowledge (Without Explicit Intent): A knows Z is hiding behind a bush. A convinces B to shoot at the bush to scare someone, knowing it is likely to kill Z. B shoots and kills Z. A is ...
Scope: Section 50 (4) applies to the personal search (body search) of a female suspect. It does not apply to the search of a vehicle, bag, or house. Role of SHO: Even if an authorized male officer ...
In India, courts impose the death penalty only in the "rarest of rare" cases, as established in the landmark Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) case, by balancing aggravating circumstances ...
This analysis details a decade-long legal battle catalyzed by an employee's fundamental act of misconduct, which culminated ...
Pradesh High Court in Ashok Kumar Kirtiwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 2001 SCC OnLine MP 83, held that the State ...
Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe. KESHAW MAHTO @ KESHAW KUMAR MAHTO Vs STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. Dated: JANUARY 12, 2026.
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果