The two cases questioned a longstanding precedent that upheld such laws, which opponents say violate free speech rights.

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...

The Supreme Court has declined to hear a pair of cases from abortion opponents who say laws limiting anti-abortion ...

On February 18, a federal court lifted the remaining injunction blocking enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), previously ...

The Supreme Court opted against hearing arguments in a pair of appeals Monday seeking to wipe out protest buffer zones around ...

Bruce M. Selya, a longtime federal judge from Rhode Island who was known as one of the most creative writers in the judiciary ...

The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a challenge to the legality of buffer zones used to protect access to ...

The Labor Department was granted its motion to pause two federal court cases challenging its Retirement Security Rule, which ...

A group of Ohioans is urging a state appeals court to secure nearly $900 million in pandemic unemployment assistance state ...

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Alabama can’t deny citizens the ability to sue the state’s Department of Labor ...

Ames v. Ohio should be an easy — and potentially unanimously decided — case, assuming the Court doesn’t overreach.

A lawsuit filed by 17 states challenging federal rules entitling workers to time off and other accommodations for ...