The Federal Circuit says that you must disclose and describe the prior art, or your Jepson claim is invalid. Obviously, this ...

The U.S. Supreme Court decided on March 10 to revive a claim by a family over an heirloom, an impressionist painting that had ...

The heirs of an Austrian Jewish performer claim the Art Institute of Chicago improperly acquired a World War II-era drawing ...

Though the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians opposed the fishing rights agreement, the appellate court said the “overriding priority” was to both protect tribal rights and to preserve the ...

The new statute requires courts to use California law when hearing cases filed by California residents or their families to recover stolen art or other significant artifacts held by museums.

Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision vacating the Patent Trial and ...

The art market inevitably follows the money, and the state’s art scene has been expanding in tandem with its GDP.

A 20-year legal odyssey seeking the return of a Nazi-looted painting that once belonged to the German Jewish family of a ...

In HD Silicon Solutions LLC V. Microchip Technology Inc., Appeal No. 23-1397, the Federal Circuit held that  all but one patent claim were invalid ...

In 1939, the Nazis forced her to give the state the painting for the equivalent of about $360 today. In exchange she was ...

Justices overturn the 9th Circuit Court again, saying the case should be decided under a California law that protects the rightful heirs of art lost during the Holocaust.